Why the First Wave Is Not Enough
Africa’s first fintech wave was built on mobile money. Sub-Saharan Africa now holds nearly 70% of global mobile money accounts, and annual mobile money transaction volumes exceed $800 billion. Kenya’s mobile transactions already exceed 50% of the country’s GDP. M-Pesa, MTN MoMo, Wave, PalmPay, and OPay have collectively built the most sophisticated informal payment infrastructure in the world.
But payments are approaching structural saturation in the leading markets. The growth ceiling for a mobile wallet transaction fee in a market where 40% of Sub-Saharan African adults already use mobile money services is fundamentally different from the ceiling in a market where digital credit has barely launched. BCG’s landmark 2026 analysis identifies the revenue concentration problem directly: payments currently account for 70–80% of fintech revenues across the continent. To reach $65 billion by 2030, the industry needs to expand into segments where the addressable gap is enormous and relatively untouched.
The Three Gaps That Define the Second Wave
The Credit Gap: $330 Billion in Unmet SME Financing
Over 50% of African adults currently lack access to formal credit. The SME financing shortfall alone is estimated at $330 billion. This is not primarily a demand problem — African SMEs want credit — it is a supply and infrastructure problem. Traditional banks lack the credit bureau data, mobile transaction history analysis, and operational infrastructure to profitably serve thin-file borrowers at small ticket sizes.
Digital lenders who build on top of mobile money transaction history have demonstrated they can close this gap. The Panafricanvisions analysis of the BCG report projects that digital lending will grow to represent approximately 50% of total fintech industry revenues by 2030 — the single largest segment shift in the continent’s financial history. Companies like MNT-Halan (Egypt), Moove (pan-African auto financing), and a generation of BNPL operators are establishing the product templates.
The Infrastructure Gap: Cross-Border Payment Costs Still at 6–10%
Intra-African trade is under 20% of total African trade (compared to 60%+ within Europe), and one structural reason is payment infrastructure cost. Cross-border payment fees on the continent remain among the world’s highest at 6–10%. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement has created the political framework for trade integration, but without payment infrastructure that makes it cheap and fast to settle across borders, the trade potential will not materialise.
PAPSS — the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System — is the designed solution, enabling direct currency-to-currency settlement without routing through USD or EUR intermediaries. As of 2025, the Bank of Algeria joined PAPSS alongside other North African and West African members. Less than 10% of African fintechs currently have access to comprehensive interoperable cross-border payment data systems — creating a massive opportunity for infrastructure providers who can solve settlement at scale under AfCFTA volumes.
The Insurance Gap: 80% of Small Business Transactions Still Cash-Based
Insurance penetration in most African markets outside South Africa sits below 3% of GDP. The distribution problem mirrors the original banking access problem: traditional insurance distribution requires agents, physical infrastructure, and premium collection mechanisms that exclude the informal economy. Embedded insurance — micro-insurance products embedded directly into logistics platforms, ride-hailing apps, agricultural supply chains, and e-commerce checkout flows — is the distribution model that could change this.
The product templates already exist in markets like Singapore and Southeast Asia. The adaptation challenge for Africa is building actuarial models on mobile transaction data and informal income streams rather than formal employment records.
Advertisement
What Fintechs and Investors Should Do to Catch the Second Wave
1. Move From Transaction Infrastructure to Data Infrastructure
The second wave’s competitive moat is not payment rails — it is credit and risk data. Fintechs that have been building payment products for the past five years have accumulated the transaction data that is the raw material for credit scoring, insurance underwriting, and working capital analytics. The strategic question is whether to monetise that data directly (by launching lending products) or to sell data infrastructure to banks and insurers as a B2B service. Both paths are being pursued by Africa’s leading players, and both are defensible.
2. Target B2B Embedded Finance, Not Just Consumer Lending
Consumer digital lending is competitive and increasingly facing regulatory scrutiny around interest rate caps and predatory lending concerns. B2B embedded finance — working capital loans embedded in supplier invoices, insurance embedded in shipping manifests, factoring integrated into B2B marketplace payments — is comparably large in addressable market but significantly less crowded. The TechAfrica News analysis of BCG’s report identifies B2B payment infrastructure as one of the highest-priority underfunded segments.
3. Invest in Interoperability Infrastructure Ahead of AfCFTA Trade Volumes
The AfCFTA creates a 1.3 billion-person single market. The fintechs that build PAPSS-connected settlement infrastructure, multi-currency wallet infrastructure, and cross-border KYC APIs now — before trade volumes reach the scale where competition intensifies — will have structural first-mover advantages in the continent’s most valuable long-term payment segment. The window to build interoperability infrastructure at pre-scale cost is measured in months, not years.
The Structural Lesson: Infrastructure Precedes Revenue
The original mobile money wave — M-Pesa’s launch in Kenya in 2007 to widespread adoption by 2012 — demonstrates the pattern: infrastructure investment precedes revenue realisation by five to seven years. The credit and embedded finance infrastructure being built today (open banking APIs, digital ID systems, PAPSS settlement, cross-border KYC) will generate the revenue surge in the late 2020s and early 2030s that BCG is projecting at the $65B figure.
For investors and operators, the implication is temporal: the investments that look expensive relative to near-term revenues are exactly the infrastructure positions that generate defensible returns as the market scales. Africa’s fintech second wave is not a product launch — it is a platform build that requires patient capital aligned with a 2028–2032 payoff horizon, not a 2026 quarterly return expectation. The operators who understand this distinction — and fund infrastructure accordingly — are the ones positioned to capture the continental value concentration that BCG’s projections describe.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Africa’s fintech “second wave” and why does it matter?
Africa’s fintech second wave refers to the shift from digital payments — which currently account for 70–80% of fintech revenues — into digital lending, insurance, and embedded financial services. BCG projects this expansion will drive continent-wide fintech revenues from approximately $10 billion today to $65 billion by 2030. It matters because the second wave addresses Africa’s most acute financial access gaps: the $330 billion SME credit shortfall, sub-3% insurance penetration, and the 6–10% cross-border payment cost that constrains intra-African trade.
How does PAPSS enable Africa’s second fintech wave?
PAPSS (Pan-African Payment and Settlement System) enables direct currency-to-currency settlement between African countries without routing through USD or EUR intermediaries. This reduces cross-border transaction costs from 6–10% toward 1–3%, unlocking the economics of intra-African trade payments under the AfCFTA framework. Fintechs building cross-border payment and trade finance products on PAPSS rails have structural cost advantages over correspondent-banking-dependent competitors.
Which African fintech companies are leading the second wave?
Flutterwave ($16B+ processed, 900,000+ businesses) has expanded into open banking via its Mono acquisition. MNT-Halan (Egypt) is the leading example of digital lending at scale. MTN MoMo and M-Pesa are extending into insurance and savings products. OPay and PalmPay are building B2B merchant finance products in Nigeria and Ghana. The common thread is leveraging mobile transaction data as a credit proxy to reach borrowers and insurance customers that formal institutions cannot profitably serve.
Sources & Further Reading
- Africa’s Second Fintech Wave Takes Shape — Panafricanvisions
- Africa’s Fintech Growth Set to Move Beyond Payments — TechAfrica News
- Beyond Payments: Unlocking Africa’s Second Fintech Wave — BCG
- Interconnected Fintech Systems Will Drive Africa’s Digital Finance Growth — The BFT Online
- Algeria’s Fintech Ecosystem in 2026: Building Momentum — The Fintech Times














