The IP Framework Most Algerian Developers Have Never Read
Algeria has a surprisingly comprehensive intellectual property framework on paper. Ordinance 03-05 of July 19, 2003, governs copyright and neighboring rights. Ordinance 03-07 of the same year covers patents. The trademark system operates under Ordinance 03-06. Together, these three pieces of legislation form a legal scaffold that theoretically protects everything from mobile app source code to SaaS platform architectures. Algeria is also a member of WIPO, a signatory to the Paris Convention, and ratified the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) in 2000.
The problem is that almost nobody in Algeria’s growing tech ecosystem knows these laws exist, let alone how to use them. Despite the Algerian Startup Fund (ASF) offering zero IP filing fees for startups through INAPI, most developers assume their code is unprotectable. Most founders believe patents are exclusively for hardware. The disconnect between Algeria’s statutory IP protections and the tech community’s awareness of them represents one of the most significant missed opportunities in the ecosystem.
INAPI (Institut National Algérien de la Propriété Industrielle), the national IP office, handles a relatively modest volume of patent activity. According to WIPO data, approximately 1,100 patent applications originated from Algerian applicants in 2024 — a figure that has been growing rapidly (WIPO reported 42% year-on-year growth), yet still a fraction of the volume processed by Morocco’s OMPIC, which registered nearly 2,900 patents in 2022 alone. Software and digital technology filings represent only a small minority of INAPI’s workload. The infrastructure for IP protection exists. The culture of using it does not.
—
Can You Patent Software in Algeria?
The short answer is: it depends on how you frame it. Ordinance 03-07 excludes “programs for computers” from patentability when claimed “as such,” alongside other non-patentable subject matter such as scientific theories, mathematical methods, and methods for performing purely intellectual actions. This mirrors the European Patent Convention’s approach rather than the more permissive US system. You cannot patent an algorithm or a piece of code directly. But you can patent a technical process or method that happens to be implemented in software — provided it produces a “technical effect” beyond the normal interaction between software and hardware.
In practice, this means a novel data compression algorithm implemented in software is not patentable as a computer program, but a system that uses that algorithm to solve a specific technical problem (say, reducing latency in satellite communication by 40%) could qualify. The distinction is subtle and requires careful claim drafting. INAPI examiners have limited experience with software-adjacent patent claims, which means outcomes are unpredictable. Filing through the PCT route and designating Algeria can sometimes yield more consistent results, since the international search report provides a framework that INAPI examiners can reference.
For most Algerian startups, the practical advice is straightforward: patent protection for software is possible but expensive. Official fees alone — including filing (7,500 DZD), publication (5,000 DZD), and annual maintenance fees (5,000 to 20,000 DZD per year, escalating over 20 years) — total approximately 260,000 DZD over a patent’s lifetime. When patent attorney and agent fees are included, total costs can reach 400,000-600,000 DZD. Note that INAPI increased official fees as of January 2026, with a new 19% VAT now applied to IP services. Unless you have a genuinely novel technical invention with commercial value worth defending, other IP strategies will serve you better.
—
Advertisement
Copyright: The Default Protection Nobody Uses Properly
Copyright is actually the strongest and most accessible IP protection available to Algerian software developers. Under Ordinance 03-05, software is explicitly classified as a literary work and is protected automatically upon creation — no registration required. This protection covers the source code, object code, preparatory design materials, and documentation. For individual authors, protection lasts for 50 years after the author’s death (Article 54). For collective works — which includes most software developed within companies — the duration is 50 years from the date of first publication (Article 56). If the work has not been published within 50 years of completion, the protection period runs from the date it was first made available to the public.
What copyright does not protect is the underlying idea, algorithm, or functionality. If you build an e-commerce platform, copyright protects your specific code implementation — but it does not stop someone from building a competing platform with identical features using entirely different code. This is the critical limitation that most developers misunderstand. Copyright protects expression, not concept.
The practical steps that Algerian developers should take are frustratingly simple yet almost universally ignored. First, maintain version control with timestamps (Git repositories serve as evidence of creation dates). Second, include copyright notices in source headers and documentation. Third, create verifiable evidence of your creation dates — Algeria does not have a formal copyright registration system, but developers can establish proof of authorship through notarized deposits, timestamped electronic records, or registered mail to themselves. ONDA (Office National des Droits d’Auteur) handles collective rights management and anti-piracy enforcement, but does not operate a copyright registration office. Fourth, when working with contractors or freelancers, ensure written agreements that explicitly assign IP rights. Under Algerian law, consistent with its civil law tradition, the default position is that the creator (the developer) owns the copyright, not the entity that commissioned the work — a trap that has caught numerous Algerian startups that assumed they owned code written by freelancers.
—
Trade Secrets, NDAs, and the Open-Source Question
For many Algerian tech companies, trade secret protection is the most practical IP strategy available. Trade secrets require no registration, no fees, and no interaction with government agencies. Under Algerian commercial law, confidential business information is protectable provided the company takes reasonable steps to maintain its secrecy. This means implementing access controls, using non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) with employees and partners, and documenting what information is considered confidential.
The enforceability of NDAs in Algeria is an area of genuine legal uncertainty. Algerian courts have upheld non-compete and confidentiality clauses in employment contracts, but litigation is slow — commercial disputes can take years to resolve through Algeria’s court system, and damages awards are typically modest. Foreign companies considering partnerships with Algerian firms frequently require IP protections that go beyond what Algerian courts can reliably enforce — which is why many joint ventures include arbitration clauses referencing ICC or CACI (Chambre Algérienne de Commerce et d’Industrie) rules, with a seat outside Algeria.
The open-source question adds another layer of complexity. Algeria’s developer community is heavily reliant on open-source software, yet understanding of open-source license obligations is minimal. The GPL, Apache 2.0, and MIT licenses each impose different conditions on derivative works. Algerian law recognizes the contractual nature of software licenses, meaning open-source license terms are theoretically enforceable. But no Algerian court has ever adjudicated an open-source license dispute. Startups building commercial products on top of GPL-licensed code risk inadvertent copyleft obligations that could require them to open-source their own proprietary additions. This is not a hypothetical risk — it is a compliance gap that any foreign investor or acquirer will flag during due diligence.
—
Advertisement
🧭 Decision Radar
| Dimension | Assessment |
| Relevance for Algeria | Critical — the tech ecosystem cannot mature without IP literacy and enforcement |
| Action Timeline | Immediate — copyright notices and NDAs cost nothing and can be implemented today; patent strategy is medium-term |
| Key Stakeholders | INAPI, ONDA, Algeria Startup Fund, Ministry of Knowledge Economy, developer communities |
| Decision Type | Educational |
| Priority Level | High |
Quick Take: Algeria’s IP laws are more protective of software than most developers realize, but enforcement is weak and awareness is near-zero. Startups should prioritize copyright documentation and trade secret protection immediately — these cost almost nothing and provide meaningful legal cover. Patent filings should be reserved for genuinely novel technical inventions with clear commercial defensibility.
Sources & Further Reading
- Ordinance 03-05 on Copyright and Neighboring Rights — WIPO Lex
- Ordinance 03-07 on Patents — WIPO Lex
- Ordinance 03-06 on Trademarks — WIPO Lex
- INAPI Official Portal — Institut National Algérien de la Propriété Industrielle
- ONDA — Office National des Droits d’Auteur et Droits Voisins
- WIPO Algeria Country Profile — Intellectual Property Statistics
- Algeria IP Country Fiche — European IP Helpdesk
- Algeria Patents & Trademarks Legal Handbook — Pharmaboardroom
- Algeria Patent Renewal Fees Schedule — PatentRenewal.com
- CACI Arbitration Rules — Chambre Algérienne de Commerce et d’Industrie
- European Patent Convention Article 52 — Software Patentability Exclusions
- Algeria IP Fees Revised Under 2026 Finance Law — NJQ & Associates
- Algeria Protecting Intellectual Property — US International Trade Administration
- ICC Arbitration Rules — International Commercial Disputes
Advertisement