Why Decree 26-97 Changes the Hardware Startup Calculus
Algeria’s Electronic Communications Act has long required that any device connecting to the public open network or using radio spectrum undergo a formal type approval process — known locally as homologation — administered by ARPCE (Autorité de Régulation de la Poste et des Communications Électroniques) or the ANF (Agence Nationale des Fréquences), depending on device category. Until January 2026, certificates were valid for 3 years, creating a renewal cycle that forced hardware startups to budget for recertification as a near-permanent cost of doing business.
Executive Decree No. 26-97, published in Official Gazette No. 13 on 15 February 2026, changes three structural elements simultaneously: it extends validity to 5 years, introduces a mandatory digital application portal replacing paper and in-person submissions, and defines a 5-working-day sample delivery window after which applications are voided. For a startup with limited compliance resources, these changes reorder the priority stack — not just for cost management, but for product roadmap timing.
The reform is part of Algeria’s broader administrative digitalization push. But unlike some e-government initiatives that digitize the form without changing the substance, Decree 26-97 modifies the underlying regulatory framework, making it substantively more startup-accessible. Compliance consultants tracking the decree describe it as “the biggest administrative modernization of the homologation regime in over a decade.”
What Changed, What Stayed the Same
Understanding the scope of the reform requires separating the structural changes from the unchanged obligations.
What changed:
- Certificate validity: 3 years → 5 years. Existing valid certificates retain their original expiry date; they are not automatically extended. New applications from February 2026 onward receive the 5-year term.
- Submission channel: paper/in-person → mandatory electronic portal. The decree makes the digital platform the only valid submission method for new applications.
- Sample logistics window: undefined → 5 working days. Applicants must ship physical samples within 5 working days of application submission. Late samples result in automatic rejection with no administrative grace period.
- Transparency: approved devices now published on ANF and ARPCE official websites, creating a public registry IoT buyers and procurement teams can reference.
What stayed the same:
- Regulatory authority split: ARPCE handles equipment connecting to the public open network (most consumer and enterprise IoT); ANF handles purely radio devices (e.g., spectrum-only point-to-point links). Dual-category devices fall under ARPCE. Startups must identify the correct authority before filing.
- Labeling obligation: Approval marks must appear directly on the device. If space is technically infeasible — common with miniaturized IoT sensors — the label may appear in the user manual or packaging.
- GSMA TAC requirement for cellular devices: Any IoT device using a SIM/eSIM for cellular connectivity must carry a GSMA Type Approval Code (TAC). This requirement predates Decree 26-97 and remains unchanged.
Advertisement
The Digital Portal: What Startups Need to Prepare
The new electronic application platform represents the single most operationally significant change for hardware startups. According to compliance specialist iCertifi, the platform centralizes document upload, application tracking, and correspondence with ARPCE — eliminating the informal relationship-management practices that previously characterized the process.
Preparation checklist for the portal:
1. Technical documentation package. Gather device specifications, RF output parameters, frequency bands used, and any existing international certifications (CE, FCC, PTCRB). Algeria does not automatically recognize foreign certifications, but they support technical review and typically accelerate the process.
2. Sample logistics plan. The 5-working-day delivery window documented in GMA Labs’ homologation procedures breakdown is unforgiving. Startups shipping from international suppliers or assembling locally must build this deadline into their product intake workflow. A delayed sample restarts the clock from a new application — not from the original submission.
3. GSMA TAC coordination (cellular IoT only). If the device uses LTE-M, NB-IoT, or any cellular standard, the TAC must be obtained from GSMA before filing with ARPCE. TAC issuance typically takes 4-6 weeks through GSMA’s certification process.
4. Labeling engineering. Confirm during the industrial design phase — not after first production run — that the approved mark can appear on the device casing. For extremely small form factors (agricultural soil sensors, wearable health monitors), plan for manual/packaging placement and document this decision in the application.
What This Means for Hardware and IoT Founders
1. Extend Your Planning Horizon to 5 Years
The previous 3-year certificate forced hardware startups to budget for recertification before the product had finished its market validation cycle. A 5-year certificate aligns with a more realistic product lifecycle: launch, iteration, market traction, and either exit or evolution. Founders can now treat type approval as a one-time go-to-market cost rather than a recurring overhead line. For products in sectors like smart water metering, precision agriculture, or connected health devices — all areas of active government interest in Algeria — this extended horizon directly improves unit economics.
2. Treat the Digital Portal as a Competitive Differentiator
Larger incumbents with established distributor relationships historically navigated the paper-based process through intermediaries, creating informal barriers that small startups struggled to match. The mandatory digital portal levels this playing field. A well-prepared startup with complete documentation can submit on day one of product readiness; incumbents face the same queue. This is a genuine window for hardware startups to gain regulatory clearance without the historical relationship premium.
3. Build Sample Logistics Into Your Supply Chain, Not Your Compliance Plan
The 5-working-day window is not a compliance detail — it is a supply chain constraint. Startups sourcing from Chinese contract manufacturers, Moroccan assembly partners, or European component suppliers must embed sample delivery logistics into the manufacturing order, not treat it as a post-submission afterthought. A suggested approach: maintain a “regulatory sample inventory” of 2-3 units per model that can be dispatched by courier immediately upon portal submission.
4. Use the Public Device Registry for B2B Sales
ARPCE and ANF now publish approved devices publicly. For startups selling to enterprises, municipalities, or government entities — all of which have procurement compliance requirements — appearing on this registry is a sales asset. Reference it in RFP responses and tender documents. Procurement officers verifying vendor compliance can confirm approval status without direct contact with the regulator.
5. Map Your Device Portfolio to the Right Authority Early
Startups building multi-function devices — for example, an agricultural sensor that uses both a licensed frequency band (ANF jurisdiction) and connects to a public SIM network (ARPCE jurisdiction) — must determine which authority handles the dual-category filing. Misrouting an application costs weeks. Engage an Algerian telecom compliance consultant to classify each product SKU before any application is filed.
The Larger Picture: Algeria’s Hardware Regulatory Modernization
Decree 26-97 does not exist in isolation. It follows ARPCE’s 2025 cloud licensing framework and sits within a government strategy that explicitly targets homegrown hardware manufacturing — including Algeria’s first domestic chip initiative at CDTA (Centre de Développement des Technologies Avancées), which produced a prototype 65nm processor in 2026. These are signals that the regulatory environment for hardware is being deliberately modernized to accommodate domestic production and reduce import dependency.
For IoT hardware startups, the directional reading is clear: the government wants certified local products, not just certified imported ones. A startup that navigates the new type approval process successfully builds regulatory capital — proven compliance track record, registered devices, established ARPCE relationship — that compounds over time as Algeria’s connected-device market grows with 5G deployment and industrial IoT adoption in energy and manufacturing.
The 5-year validity extension, the digital portal, and the transparent public registry together represent a meaningful reduction in the administrative premium that hardware startups pay compared to software-only businesses. That premium has not been eliminated, but it has been compressed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do existing type approval certificates need to be resubmitted under Decree 26-97?
No. Certificates that were valid at the time Decree 26-97 was published (15 February 2026) remain valid until their original expiry date. They do not need to be resubmitted or converted to 5-year terms. At renewal time, the new framework and digital portal will apply.
Can a startup use CE or FCC certification as a substitute for ARPCE type approval?
No. Algeria does not recognize CE, FCC, or other international certifications as equivalent to or substitutes for domestic type approval. However, holding international certifications is advantageous: ARPCE’s technical review references the underlying test data, which can accelerate its own assessment. International certifications reduce the technical burden but do not eliminate the local filing requirement.
What happens if a product is sold in Algeria before obtaining type approval?
Selling or distributing non-approved equipment that connects to public networks or uses radio spectrum is a regulatory violation subject to sanctions by ARPCE. Beyond formal penalties, distributors and retail channels increasingly request type approval documentation as part of their own compliance due diligence. The risk is both regulatory and commercial.
—













