The Gig Economy Reckoning: How Global Labor Classification Laws Are Reshaping Platform Work

Hundreds of Millions of Workers, One Unresolved Question

The scale of global platform work defies easy measurement. Survey-based methods estimate at least 154 million online gig workers worldwide, while broader World Bank models that capture occasional platform users put the figure as high as 435 million, or roughly 12.5% of the global labor force. The number of digital labor platforms themselves grew from 193 in 2010 to over 1,070 in 2023, according to the International Labour Organization. These workers drive for Uber and Lyft, deliver for DoorDash and Deliveroo, freelance on Upwork and Fiverr, clean homes through TaskRabbit, and provide care services through Care.com. They generated over $556 billion in gross services volume in 2024, constituting one of the fastest-growing segments of the global labor market. Yet the legal question at the center of their working lives remains unresolved in most jurisdictions: are they employees entitled to minimum wages, social security, sick leave, and collective bargaining rights, or are they independent contractors bearing the full risk and cost of their own labor?

The classification question is not academic. It determines whether a delivery rider injured on the job receives workers’ compensation or pays their own medical bills. It determines whether a driver who works 50 hours a week for a single platform earns minimum wage or can earn less. It determines whether platforms like Uber, which reported $44 billion in revenue in 2024, must pay employer-side social security contributions that could add 20-40% to their labor costs, or whether they can continue operating with a workforce that bears its own social protection costs.

The past three years have produced a cascade of regulatory actions tilting the balance toward reclassification. The European Union’s Platform Work Directive, approved by the European Parliament in April 2024 and formally adopted by the Council in October 2024, creates a legal presumption of employment for platform workers. The UK Supreme Court’s 2021 Uber ruling, classifying drivers as “workers” (a UK-specific intermediate category), has been followed by similar decisions in the Netherlands, Spain, and France. In the United States, the regulatory landscape has swung sharply: the Biden administration’s Department of Labor issued a new independent contractor rule in March 2024, replacing a business-friendly test with a multi-factor “economic reality” analysis, but the Trump administration suspended enforcement of that rule in May 2025 and announced plans to rescind it, reverting to a more employer-friendly standard.

---

The EU Platform Work Directive: Employment Presumption at Continental Scale

The EU Platform Work Directive (Directive 2024/2831), approved by the European Parliament in April 2024 and formally adopted by the Council on 14 October 2024, represents the most comprehensive regulatory intervention in the gig economy to date. Published in the Official Journal on 11 November 2024 and entering into force on 1 December 2024, the Directive gives member states until 2 December 2026 to transpose it into national law. It creates a rebuttable presumption of employment for individuals performing platform work. When a platform exercises a defined degree of control over the worker (controlling remuneration, supervising performance, restricting the ability to work for competitors, determining appearance or conduct, limiting the ability to build a client base), the worker is legally presumed to be an employee. The burden shifts to the platform to prove otherwise.

The Directive covers an estimated 28.3 million platform workers across the EU, of whom the European Commission estimates 5.5 million are subject to a significant degree of platform control and likely misclassified as independent contractors. The Commission’s impact assessment projects that between 1.7 million and 4.1 million workers will ultimately be reclassified, costing platforms between EUR 1.9 billion and EUR 4.5 billion annually in additional social security contributions, benefits, and compliance costs. Member states stand to gain up to EUR 4 billion per year in social protection and tax revenues. For individual platforms, the financial impact is substantial. Deliveroo, which exited the Netherlands in November 2022 amid a series of lower court rulings classifying its riders as employees, cited labor classification uncertainty as a material business risk. The Dutch Supreme Court confirmed the employee classification in March 2023, after Deliveroo had already ceased operations in the country.

The Directive also introduces algorithmic management transparency requirements. Platforms must inform workers about automated monitoring and decision-making systems, including how these systems affect working conditions, task allocation, earnings, and account deactivation. Workers gain the right to human review of significant algorithmic decisions. These provisions address a complaint common among gig workers globally: that their livelihoods are controlled by opaque algorithms that can reduce earnings, restrict task access, or terminate their accounts without explanation or recourse.

Member state transposition will determine the Directive’s practical impact. Countries like Spain, which already enacted a rider law (Ley Rider, Royal Decree-Law 9/2021) effective August 2021 creating an employment presumption for delivery riders, may implement the Directive with minimal changes. Others, like France, which has historically preferred a third-category approach (neither fully employee nor independent contractor), face more significant legal adjustments. The December 2026 transposition deadline ensures that the next ten months will see intensive legislative activity across all 27 member states.

---

Global Regulatory Landscape: Convergence with National Variation

Beyond the EU, the trend toward worker protection is evident across multiple jurisdictions, though the specific mechanisms vary considerably. The United Kingdom, following the Supreme Court’s Uber BV v. Aslam decision in February 2021, classifies Uber drivers as “workers,” an intermediate category that provides minimum wage, holiday pay, and pension contributions but not full employment protections. The precedent has influenced subsequent tribunal decisions affecting Deliveroo, Addison Lee, and other platform operators, generating significant compliance costs for platforms operating in the UK market.

In the United States, the landscape is fragmented and politically volatile. The Biden administration’s Department of Labor issued a final rule effective March 2024 applying a six-factor economic reality test to determine whether workers are employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The rule made it harder for platforms to classify workers as independent contractors by emphasizing the degree of control exercised and the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss. However, the Trump administration moved to reverse course: in May 2025, the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division directed field offices to stop applying the 2024 rule, reverting instead to the older 2008 “economic realities” test. In September 2025, the DOL formally announced its intention to rescind the Biden-era rule, though it technically remains on the books and may still be invoked in private litigation. Meanwhile, California’s Proposition 22, unanimously upheld by the California Supreme Court in July 2024 (Castellanos v. State of California), allows app-based transportation and delivery companies to classify drivers as independent contractors while providing limited benefits. The result is a patchwork where the same worker’s classification can depend on which state they operate in and which federal, state, or local law is being applied.

Brazil’s regulatory approach has evolved in stages. Law No. 14.297, which took effect in January 2022, provided temporary protections for app-based delivery workers during the COVID-19 emergency, including accident insurance and a transparent payment methodology, but explicitly did not establish a formal employment relationship. More significantly, President Lula submitted Bill 536/2024 in March 2024 proposing comprehensive regulation of app-based rideshare drivers, including a maximum 12-hour workday per platform, a new legal category of “autonomous platform worker,” a proposed minimum hourly rate, and mandatory social security contributions (7.5% from workers, 20% from platforms). As of early 2026, the bill remains under review in Brazil’s Congress, with a separate bill addressing delivery workers also under debate.

India, where government estimates place the gig workforce at approximately 7.7 million in 2020-21 and projections from NITI Aayog forecast 23.5 million by 2029-30, took a landmark step when the Code on Social Security 2020 finally came into effect on 21 November 2025, more than five years after Parliament passed it. The Code for the first time defines “gig workers” and “platform workers” as legal categories eligible for social security benefits, requiring platform aggregators to contribute 1-2% of annual turnover to a Social Security Fund. However, implementation remains challenging: as of late 2025, only around 300,000 platform workers had registered on the government’s E-Shram portal, and the specifics of benefit delivery, contribution tracking across multiple platforms, and payout timelines remain unclear. State-level progress is uneven, with Karnataka passing its own Gig Workers Act while Rajasthan’s legislation has stalled.

Australia, following a comprehensive independent review of the gig economy, enacted the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act in 2023, which extends the Fair Work Commission’s jurisdiction to cover “employee-like” gig workers, enabling the Commission to set minimum standards for payment, insurance, and dispute resolution. Provisions covering gig economy workers commenced in August 2024, affecting an estimated 250,000 workers. The Australian approach is notable for its pragmatism: rather than reclassifying workers as employees, it extends specific protections while preserving the flexibility that workers and platforms value.

---

Algeria’s Stake: Freelance Platforms, Yassir Drivers, and the Informal Economy

Algeria’s connection to the global gig economy operates through two channels: domestic platform work and international freelancing. Domestically, Yassir’s driver and delivery network constitutes the largest platform workforce in the country. Yassir operates across multiple Algerian cities as part of its broader presence in 45 cities spanning Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and other markets, with over 130,000 partners and 8 million users across all countries. While Algeria-specific driver counts are not publicly disclosed, Yassir represents the country’s most significant platform workforce. These workers are currently classified as independent service providers under Yassir’s terms of service. They receive no minimum wage guarantee, no social security contributions, no paid leave, and no accident insurance beyond what they arrange independently. Algerian labor law (Law No. 90-11 of April 21, 1990) defines employment relationships but has not been updated to address platform-mediated work.

Internationally, a growing number of Algerian tech workers earn income through global freelance platforms. Upwork, Fiverr, Freelancer.com, and Toptal host Algerian software developers, graphic designers, translators, and data analysts serving international clients. These workers operate in a regulatory vacuum: they are neither employees under Algerian law (they have no Algerian employer) nor formally registered independent businesses in most cases. Their income is often received through informal channels due to Algeria’s foreign exchange controls and limited international payment infrastructure.

The social protection gap is the most immediate concern. Algeria’s social security system (CNAS for salaried workers, CASNOS for the self-employed) requires employer and employee contributions linked to formal employment contracts. Gig workers who are classified as independent contractors but lack the means or incentive to register with CASNOS fall outside the social protection system entirely. They accumulate no pension rights, have no access to occupational health insurance, and receive no unemployment benefits. For a 25-year-old Yassir driver, this means decades of work without building any social security entitlement, a time bomb that will become a public policy crisis as the first generation of gig workers reaches retirement age.

The regulatory response requires balancing multiple objectives: protecting workers without destroying the platform economy that provides income in a market with approximately 11% unemployment, extending social security coverage without imposing compliance costs that drive platforms out of the market, and formalizing the international freelance economy without triggering tax burdens that push it further into informality. The EU Platform Work Directive and Australian “employee-like” models offer templates, but any Algerian solution must account for the country’s specific labor market structure, social security architecture, and foreign exchange constraints.

---

---

Sources & Further Reading

• EU Platform Work Directive — Council Adoption (October 2024)
• ILO Digital Labour Platforms — Global Overview
• Uber BV v. Aslam — UK Supreme Court (2021)
• US Department of Labor — Independent Contractor Rule (2024)
• Trump DOL Suspends Biden-Era Independent Contractor Rule (2025)
• California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22 (July 2024)
• Australia Fair Work Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act
• India Code on Social Security 2020 — Implementation (November 2025)
• Dutch Supreme Court — Deliveroo Riders as Employees (2023)
• Brazil Bill 536/2024 — Lula Rideshare Worker Regulation
• Spain Ley Rider — Royal Decree-Law 9/2021